Follow/Friend/Like us

SIGN UP FOR FITNESS TIPS SPECIAL OFFERS
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon
For Email Newsletters you can trust
Studio banter
Aegis TV



Aegis' Jay Benedetti demonstrates great forearm technique

CONTACT US

AEGIS TRAINING
Personal Training / Trainer
16 Hewett Street
City of London
EC2A 3NN
0207 247 5072

info@aegistraining.co.uk

Wednesday
Feb222012

Built For Borg Part 2- Long Boring Cardio

The built for Borg saga continues. If you're just joining us, Sam Feltham of Smash the Fat bootcamps and yours truly have been asked by bjorn borg , former tennis star and now purveyor of high class underpants, to pose in said underpants as part of some marketing campaign.

 

Being complete media whores, we've accepted the challenge but we're in no mood to plaster our bits all over the Internet if we're not looking in tip top shape.

 

Given the slim time frame we've decided to use every trick in the book to look as lean as possible in these photos, and exhibitionists that we are we will be documenting our journey from reasonably fit to artificially ripped, all for your viewing pleasure, you lovely people.

 

As well as documenting it, if you  keep your eye out you may be seeing us pop up in a few magazines and newspapers over the next few weeks, more on that when we have confirmation.

 

So anyway,  here's video number two where we discuss the somewhat controversial subject of LBC, aka long boring cardio.

 

If you watch to the very end you'll discover the reason for my slightly manic rambling at the start. Enjoy!

Zack

 

Friday
Feb172012

Principles Of Successful Fat Loss Programs

I am always asking myself how I can get better results with my clients. Given the fact that if I don't get results I don't eat, that should come as no great surprise. 

 

The question I'm really interested in is; what are the key underlying principles of success with the clients we serve? 

 

The internet is full of weight loss answers; special techniques, sexy exercises, set and rep schemes , diet programs and supplements. 

 

But that's not the answer I'm after. Quite honestly, many of these approaches are pretty interchangeable. Arguing about wether you should do low or high intensity cardio seems a little inconsequential, despite having entire annexes of the interwebs devoted to vitriolic arguments in favour of, or opposition to, each. Of course the truth is both can work, both have drawbacks, and neither get us closer to answering my question.

 

I have asked myself that question even more since I realised that the women on our online Skinny Bitch program are getting better results than most people training in a gym by themselves, taking part in group exercise, and (though I hate to say it) training one-on-one with a PT. I don't say that to criticise other trainers, its a generalisation and the good ones are getting great results. But I know that if a client achieved the kind of results with a trainer one-on-one that we've been getting online, they'd be pretty pleased with themselves.

 

To clarify, these women are getting these results without ever meeting me in person. They are training for only 20 minutes a day with no equipment, just bodyweight, and I'll be the first to admit its a very basic training program. They're not taking any special supplements, and they're not starving themselves.

 

So while I'm not saying the technical aspects of program design are irrelevant, far from it, I'm saying they are not the key underlying principle of success. So what are they? 

 

I've said before that there are two ways to get amazing results as a trainer.

 

1- Only train people who come to you ready to do everything you say. 

 

2-Get really good at bringing people to the point where they're ready to do everything you say.

 

The first type of person is the dream client, and I've had a few over the years. With these clients I can say "See that wall? I want you to run through it."

 

And they'll say "how many sets?"

 

But honestly, anyone could get results with those people. As fun as they are to train, they would do any program with enough effort and dedication to see results.

 

So I'm very interested in point 2.

 

Compliance, compliance, compliance. A terrible training program done with diligence and consistency will outstrip an advanced program done half-assed, any old day of the week. 

 

Compliance is achieved through having a level of accountability.

 

This is where weight watchers gets it right. You are exponentially more likely to stick to a program if you are being held accountable. Weekly weigh-ins at weight watchers achieve this, but I've also had many clients over the years say that simply having an appointment with me each week made them stick to their diet or training plan in the intervening days. 

 

"Why?" I would ask

 

"Because I knew you were going to ask me about it." 

 

On the Skinny Bitch program, our members have the one-two punch of me on their backs every week via email, and (more importantly) the other members in the Skinny Bitch private Facebook group looking on and encouraging them.

 

This positive social pressure is another factor in achieving compliance, and again another reason that weight watchers has enjoyed success despite the fact that the actual nutrition information is not in line with what I would ever recommend.

 

The final factor in compliance is, I believe, the client's level of belief in their ability to achieve their goal, and to do what you're asking them to do. 

 

Let me put it like this. do you want to be in the best shape of your life? I'll tell you how, its simple really.

 

Train with weights twice a day at least four days a week...

 

Do low intensity steady state cardio every morning before breakfast...

 

Consume exclusively organic meat and vegetables and filtered water...

 

Ok I'll stop there. If you're anything like most people, the regime I just described is so massively different to your current lifestyle that your immediate reaction was to focus on why you couldn't do it. That process would only serve to more deeply entrench you in your old habits, as you think of ever more reasons why those changes are impossible you further convince yourself that your current lifestyle is the only logical choice. It also sets up a client-trainer relationship that is pretty adversarial. "Who the hell is this person who's telling me to do a load of unpleasant, inconvenient things that clearly don't fit into my life?"

 

So once again, a simple plan done well is better than a perfect plan not done at all. 

 

Skinny Bitch was designed to overcome every conceivable barrier faced by the average, busy women. The nutrition plan is broken into manageable chunks so that our members aren't overwhelmed. Having said all that, its still very tough. Change always is. But that combination of accountability, social support from a peer group and a realistic, achievable action plan has been a winning combination.

 

So yes, a bad program done well is better than a great program that you can't stick to.

 

But when you combine the two, when you have a great program you can stick to, you get results like this.

 


 

Julia, 2.5 stone lost on the Skinny Bitch Program

We are taking bookings for the Skinny Bitch Online Fat Loss Program now. The next round begins on February 27th.

Contact zack@aegistraining.co.uk to apply.

 

Tuesday
Feb142012

How To Cheat Your Way Lean-Built For Borg Part 1

Skipping in bin bags, Bjorn Borg, underpants, and how to cheat your way lean in 2 weeks. All is revealed in the video below...

Friday
Feb102012

Cool Stuff I've read this week

I like to read a lot. From health and fitness, to psychology, science and philosophy to pop culture geekery I'm a fairly voracious consumer of written content, particularly online. And if you're a regular reader of this blog I'd guess you are too. But with the huge volume of content published online on a daily basis its sometimes hard to sort through and find the good stuff. So I thought I'd try and help in some small way by filtering through the crap and showing some of the particularly interesting stuff I've stumbled across on the interwebs this week.

(This may or may not become a regular weekly thing, I fear commitment and have a low threshold for boredom so I'm not making any promises)

 

1- Here's a good summary of the debate about government regulation of sugar that was doing the rounds this week. I haven't made my mind up about this yet to be honest, though theres certainly a case to be made that sugar is at least as harmful as othe rgovernment regulated substances like alcohol and cigarettes.

http://bengoldacre.posterous.com/should-we-regulate-sugar-like-alcohol

2- A great summary of the current research around antioxidant supplementation. The whole "antioxidants good, free radicals bad" is a total oversimplification, with some high quality research suggesting that snitioxidant supplementation is worse than useless. 

http://workout911.com/?p=3680

3- A cool little piece on Derren Brown's blog about imposter syndrome and the Duning Krueger effect. This is something I've planned to write about for a while as this phenomenon runs rampant in the health and fitness industry, but here's a good intro to the concept-

http://derrenbrown.co.uk/blog/2012/02/ubiquity-impostor-syndrome/

4-Very interesting article with some very early stage research into intermittent fasting and cancer treatment. I'm not suggesting for a second that IF is a magic bullet, though I am a fan, but this is a good read that further builds the case for including it in some format.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2012/02/fasting-and-cancer?fsrc=gn_ep

5- And finally, a little plug for myself. This is a brief article I wrote for another trainers newsletter detailing some of the factors I need to take into account when dealing with our typical client base, namely high stress, time poor city workers. Enjoy!

http://archive.aweber.com/fittraindown/7Datw/h/_Fitness_Training_Downloads.html

 

Thursday
Feb092012

Bodyweight training - not as lame as I thought - part 2

Last week I spoke about my recent foray into bodyweight trainig following my shameful realisation that I couldnt perform a one-arm press-up on my left side.

Years of barbell bench pressing appeared to do me no good, as one particular (smaller) trainer at our studio happily bashed out a number of bodyweight feats which I immediately failed at. This left me utterly emasculated, but eager to rectify things. 

So, I decided on 3 basic bodyweight exercises to master;

-The one arm press up

-The pistol/single leg squat

-The lever

And set out a plan of attack.

As I mentioned in part 1, bodyweight training lends itself to higher frequency, submaximal training. In plain English, the best way to master many bodyweight drills, is to perform them as frequently as you can without ever fully exerting yourself on each set. 

In essence, these movements are skills to be practised rather than trained to exhaustion. 

So with that in mind I came up with regressions (easier variations) of each exercise and set out to perform them in a circuit fashion as many times throughout the day as possible. Well known coach Pavel Tsatsouline calls this type of training "greasing the groove", the idea being that the constant, submaximal exposures to the movement makes you more and more efficient at it without overly taxing your body.

This circuit is done every day in addition to my regular strength training sessions.

Here's a quick video of the regressions I used to improve my one arm press up. In the next few posts I'll share the ones I used to improve the lever and pistol, and some thoughts on how to build it into your own training.